Monday, November 24, 2025

Why the Jordan River Utah Temple is the Most Unique Temple of All

                                      The Jordan River Utah Temple.



  THE Jordan River Utah Temple in South Jordan, Utah, was the Church’s 20th Temple. It opened in 1981 and was remodeled from 2016-2018. 
  What follows is the little known, miraculous backstory on how this temple came to be; how it defied standard church policy; and how it is the only temple that was financed entirely outside of Church resources.
   All material comes from interviews made with Fred Baker, former head of Church Physical Facilities, in the late 20th Century. Church members in the South Jordan area desperately wanted their own temple. 
  The Salt Lake Temple was 17 miles distant and that equaled almost a 30-minute drive in ideal conditions.
   It was Church policy in the 20th Century that you could donate land to the Church, but never with conditions set and what could go there. The Jordan River Temple story was a lone exception to that policy. 
  “Not one penny of church money went into the Jordan River. Not one penny,” Brother Baker said, in a 2014 interview. 
  Brother Baker continued: “The (temple) lot was given by my dear friend Alma Holt. That story is absolutely unbelievable, how Alma and his family kept that belief all those years that somehow there'd be a temple on that property out there. They were out there when that was nothing but weeds and radishes. And they kept that thing alive in their family that "there's going to be a temple. I know it." 
   (That 30 acres of land was still, at the time, three or more miles from any subdivision. The Holt Family had owned the land for about a century and to sell it to developers in the 1970s had a worth of several hundred thousand dollars. Family members over the decades had periodically talked about their property one day being the site of a temple, so that was their dream. Even when the Holts divided the land to their children, their kids all wanted to contribute enough land so the temple dream could still happen.)
  Brother Baker continued: “I went out and I met with them and said, ‘I'm sorry, Alma. You can't offer it as a temple site. You can offer it to the church, but ....’ And, so, they finally decided to offer it anyway, but asked if I'd tell the story when I presented it on the Tuesday (meeting with the First Presidency). So, I did, I presented the site and told them the story of Alma Holt. “So, we concluded the meeting, got up to leave, and President Kimball says, ‘Fred, come here just a second.’ He walked over into the corner, because I guess he didn’t want anybody to hear, and he said, ‘Will you arrange a time for the First Presidency to go see that property?’ For twelve years I had presented hundreds and hundreds of items to the First Presidency, and I never had that kind of request. I said, ‘I’d be happy to.’”
   That was just unheard of – the First Presidency wanting to see land like this so urgently. Soon after, the First Presidency gets a look at the property, though it required a drive through an irrigated farm field, complete with furrows, bumps and slow going
  Several weeks after that tour, Brother Baker and Church Architect, Emil Fetzer are summoned early one morning to meet with President Spencer W. Kimball, who basically said (by Brother Baker’s recollection):
   “We’ve decided to build a temple on the Holt property. All of our confidentiality rules are in place, but you need to start work on the plans now. Do the whole thing like Ogden and Provo as far as the interior is concerned, but this needs to be a much bigger temple.”     President Kimball wanted 120 seats in each of six endowment rooms and a beautiful steeple on top. Later, a meeting was held for Church leaders in the Salt Lake Valley and the Jordan River Temple was announced.
   All were excited, though some were shocked that it would be on WEST side of the valley, and not the east side.
   Brother Baker estimated that if he polled church members on where the second temple in the Salt Lake Valley would be, that 95 percent would have said the east side of the valley!
  He also said:  “Anyway, the Salt Lake temple district finance committee ... I mean everybody finances, puts twenty - thirty percent into their temple...they sat down and decided, ‘How much do you think it's going to be?’ And I said, ‘Well, the estimate is 15 million. I don't know, because we haven't bid.’ “They (the church members in the south end of the Salt Lake Valley) decided to raise 15 million. Everybody did! And not a penny went into that building! And for years they ran that building with extra money! And nobody knows! Sad! That should be a beacon! Wow!"
    How did the church members in the south end of the Salt Lake Valley raise so munch money? 
  Brother Baker said: “Some would give up their Christmas. The families said, ‘Let’s give our money to the temple this year.’ Some said, ‘We were going to Disneyland. How about next year for Disneyland? Let’s put that vacation money toward the temple.’ Some put off that nice refrigerator or remodeling the kitchen until the next year. Now I don’t know, I’m sure there were some sizeable contributions, but normally fundraising like this starts with five millionaires who want this project, so they each put up two and a half million dollars and then expect everybody else to cough up what they can. This was just the opposite. This was the ordinary member, his wife, and two children coughing up the whole thing. Now I’m sure some wealthy people made some marvelous contributions, but it wasn’t the basis. The basis was the member of the Salt Lake Temple district raising the money, and they did. I can’t believe it. I was flabbergasted. That was just incredible.” 
  Brother Baker said even the First Presidency was flabbergasted at how much money the Saints in the area had raised for the temple. Still, they promised to make up any shortfall. The next surprise came at the groundbreaking for the temple.
   Brother Baker recalled: “It was just hilarious. I don’t know where they got it, but it was the most gigantic earth-moving machine you have ever seen. They must have borrowed it from Kennecott Copper or something. And when the time came, President Kimball, who comes about to here on me [pointing to his shoulders], had a big hard hat on. They helped him up on this great big, mammoth machine. He started it up, lowered that big front-end loader, gave it the gas, Rrrrrrr, and broke the ground for this temple. It was just so funny. “Then President N. Eldon Tanner said, ‘From all our hearts, we want to thank all of you. The stake presidents and bishops who are here, please go back and tell your people of our gratitude for their generosity. Then he said [voice filling with emotion] . . . Let’s see . . . I’m trying to think of the exact words, ‘Please tell your people that we have all of the money that is necessary for the temple. We don’t need any further contributions.’ And, about two weeks later, another $700,000 came in … You know, you just couldn’t stop the darn thing. It was like turning on the fire hose!” 
   Brother Baker concluded his memories: “Anyway, the Lord opened the hearts of these people. So the biggest temple in the Church as to vicarious work, and most active temple ends up sitting on this site, and the Church didn’t have a penny of headquarters money in it. “     And, he said President Tanner made sure that any extra money for that temple, went to that temple, and none to the general fund.   Finally, Brother Baker said, “We had more parking out there than we had at any other temple, and they filled the parking lot and parked on the streets. The city finally came to the temple president and said, ‘We’ve got to do something.’ We had to go buy another fifteen acres and put in more parking, just so we could get the cars off the street. “Is that a remarkable story? Is that a story about the faith of the Saints in this dispensation? Well, it just hurts me that Alma Holt didn’t get any notoriety, that he had no credit that he deserved. I know he received thanks from the Presidency, and that’s probably all that mattered to him. But I just thought, ‘Gee, that’s a tremendous story.’ And all these people walking around here, they don’t know a thing about it …”

  -Fred Baker, of Ogden, was the director of Church Physical Facilities from 1965-1991. He passed away in 2015 at age 89. He was the author’s stake president at one time, as well as a family friend. 

  -The Jordan River Temple photo is from Wikipedia Commons.   
  
 NOTE: This article and all of the NighUntoKolob blog are NOT an official website of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. They are the author's conclusions and opinions only.

Why the Logan Temple was Gutted in 1976

                                Logan, Utah Temple.

   THE Logan, Utah Temple was first Latter-day Saint Temple to have muraled ordinance rooms for a live-acting endowment presentation. However, where are these pioneer-era pieces of art? 
  Why does the interior of the Logan Temple look just like the inside of any modern temple?
   This blog will eventually answer those questions and many more … First, a sidelight fact: The outside walls of the Logan Temple were originally painted a pinkish, off-color white, so as to hide the dark and rough looking limestone.
   By the early 20th Century, that paint was allowed to fade away and hence today’s exterior look of the Logan Temple. All the temple’s handcrafted, pioneer interior was removed, as well the roof, leaving only the original pioneer walls remaining. The renovation of the Logan Temple’s interior was patterned after the inside of the original Ogden and Provo Temples. 
  The formerly muraled rooms were wallpapered and made ready for all-in-one rooms, that used a motion-picture presentation of the endowment ceremony.
 When President Spencer W. Kimball rededicated the Logan Temple, on March 13-15, 1979, he expressed regret over the loss of the pioneer craftmanship of the revamped inside of the sacred structure. 
  (Note: Much of the preceding information is from the Church News of September 2, 2022.) 
  -There are rumors that a significant amount of the pioneer era murals removed from the 1970s Logan Temple are in church storage ... and could be reused, should the Logan Temple undergo another renovation some day?
   Now, here’s the bombshell – not commonly known information as to why the Logan Temple required such extensive renovation in the first place, from 1976-1979 -- 
  (This information was obtained from Fred Baker, former head of the Church Physical Facilities, from the 1970s until 1991.) 
  The Logan Temple (and Manti too) were both considered for extensive remodels in the mid-1960s, because they were overtaxed and unable to accommodate the increasing number of Latter-day Saint patrons. 
  However, according to Brother Baker, such renovation would have been too costly, as new building codes would have to follow and thus the interior of both temples would have to be gutted.
  Instead, the Church built the Ogden and Provo Temples, to take pressure off the Logan and Manti temples. This idea worked for the short term.
   By about 1974, the Church started making plans to renovate the Logan Temple. Then, a natural disaster struck – The Pocatello Valley Earthquake, a magnitude 6.3, shocked the region, with an epicenter near the Utah-Idaho border. High rise buildings in downtown Salt Lake City even swayed from the quake, though they were 100 miles distant.
   According to Brother Baker, unknown to the Church for just over a year after the Pocatello Valley quake, was that its strong tremors had cracked and broken in two the main support inside the center and upper floor of the Logan Temple, where the Solemn Assembly room was. 
  This damage was not discovered until the temple was closed and preliminary renovations started. The miracle was that the top of the Logan Temple had not already collapsed, from the quake damage.
   (It seems often that the Lord does NOT always stop tragic events, but because of his tender mercies, he does lessen and mitigate their effects.) 
  Brother Baker said when this extensive damage was discovered, the Solemn Assembly room was permanently taken out and to get everything up to code, the entire interior had to get gutted and the roof removed. Keeping the Solemn Assembly room would have equaled a haphazard look and design in the temple and the Church Architect and Church leaders agreed it had to go. 
  Hence, why the Logan Temple is only pioneer looking on the outside. 
  Brother Baker also had this say:
   “If there was ever a time when I wanted three bodyguards and somebody watching my house every minute, it was then, because of the people in Cache Valley. When you touch a local temple, and Grandpa Aaron comes after you . . . You couldn’t imagine the sheets of paper that were pasted on our cars and posted around town. ‘These horrible people are ruining our lives and wrecking our temple’ …But local people hated us for touching their temple, and I could understand that. We never received that kind of response from the local members when we did the other temples. We did all thirteen existing temples, but the Logan Temple was the only one that we got such a negative response on.”

  -Fred Baker, of Ogden, was the director of Church Physical Facilities from 1965-1991. He passed away in 2015 at age 89. He was the author’s stake president at one time, as well as a family friend. 

  NOTE: This article and all of the NighUntoKolob blog are NOT an official website of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. They are the author's conclusions and opinions only.

Sunday, September 21, 2025

Advice for Sacrament Meeting Speakers…

 

         The pulpit in a typical LDS Primary room, is almost identical to the pulpit in a chapel.


QUALITY talks in Sacrament meetings begins the second your Bishop, or Bishop’s councilor, asks you to speak…

 Here are 6 suggestions---

1. Ask your bishop or councilor how long you need to speak. Also ask if you are the last speaker, because, if so, you will need to be able to shorten your talk – at the pulpit.

2. A full, written talk is preferable, because then you won’t leave anything out you think is important and you can mark items to delete, if you need to shorten your talk.

3. Time your talk. Know how long it takes. (If you don’t do this, you may be like a recent high councilor speaker in my ward – he went 8 minutes over time and sadly all I remember of his talk is that he went way over time (stealing time from primary and Sunday School teachers in the next hour).

4. Be sure to include a few personal stories in your talk. Just reading scriptures or conference talks won’t fully engage listeners. (If you are a returning missionary, tell even more stories about your actual missionary work).

5. Do not waste time flipping pages to read a scripture, or fiddling with your phone to do so – have it written out in your written talk, right in front of you.

6. Watch the clock to know how much time is left, while you speak.

(-And, if you speak to the Primary, be super brief and simple, going from the heart.)


A checklist, to review a Sacrament meeting, from an Improvement Era Magazine, from the 1960s.

  NOTE: This article and all of the NighUntoKolob blog are NOT an official website of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. They are the author's conclusions and opinions only.



 

Monday, September 15, 2025

A Your Favorite Hymn All-Request Sacrament Meeting


 

AT the Author's Ward Sacrament meeting on September 14, 2025, an unusual thing happened ...

Looking up at the stand, there were NO speakers sitting there -- even no high council members, nothing, zero.

One suspects the worst -- is the Bishopric going to speak? Are ward members going to be asked to speak extemporaneously? Or, what?

Let's be blunt --  On one level, in recent decades, LDS Sacrament meetings are sometimes rather "boring" -- no guest speakers anymore; usually only ultra, basic assigned speaking subjects; speakers who haven't timed the length of their talks beforehand, or ones who lack any personal stories and just read scriptures, or General Conference talk excerpts.

The actual identity of the week's Sabbath "speakers" was both refreshing and surprising.

The Bishop, who was conducting the meeting, announced that he desired that Ward members came to the stand and requested the congregation sing one verse of whatever their favorite hymn was from either the new, or old hymn book -- and also briefly explain why that selection was your favorite.

The result was a very inspiring, uplifting and never boring, 30-minutes after the sacrament passing segment, that was unique.

About a dozen different ward members stood up, stated their favorite hymn -- and none took more than a minute at the pulpit -- and most of the hymns were not ones I would have expected.

The meeting proceeded in a very orderly fashion, little down time -- and no rush, until the last 6 minutes when multiple members started to walk up at the same time and the Bishop had to cut some off, citing time restraints.

From "I Am a Child of God," to several other Primary hymns, to "Put Your Shoulder to the Wheel," and some more obscure selections in between, the time rushed by and it was truly an inspiring and pleasant Sacrament meeting.

Where did the idea for this come from? Unknown, but the concept seems worth repeating once every year or so.

And, the Author's favorite hymn, "Master, The Tempest is Raging," was never mentioned, proving likely a wide variety of member favorites exists.

(Plus, you've got to credit the ward organist's great talents, for never having more than a few seconds notice on what she would need to play next.)

  UPDATE: My ward did another all-hymn request Sacrament meeting on Mother's Day, May 10, 2026. This one did not run as smoothly as the first, given a lot of toggling back-and-forth between the standard hymn book and the separate addition binder of hymns.

Also, some children made requests from the primary hymns and some kids were not able to speak for themselves, or know what the title of their favorite hymn actually was.

Notwithstanding, it was still a very inspiring meeting and such a meeting is worth having about once a year.....


 NOTE: This article and all of the NighUntoKolob blog are NOT an official website of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. They are the author's conclusions and opinions only.



Sunday, August 24, 2025

Who is the "AntiChrist'?



This classic painting is a devilish look at the AntiChrist, possibly 12th Century origin, located at the Osogovo Monastery, near Kriva Palanka in North Macedonia,

                                                          -Photograph by Edal Anton Lefterov, from Wikipedia Commons.

 

WHO is the AntiChrist?

“Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.” (1 John 2:23)

Strictly speaking, it may include anyone or any group except members of and of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Korihor in the Book of Mormon, Alma Chapter 30, is one of the classic examples of an AntiChrist.

According to the Encyclopedia of Mormonism: “Antichrists are those who deny the divinity of Jesus Christ or essential parts of his gospel and actively oppose the followers of Christ or seek to destroy their faith.”

Elder Bruce R. McConkie in “Mormon Doctrine” (page 39) stated: “An antichrist is an opponent of Christ; he one who is in opposition to the true gospel, the true church and the true plan of salvation.”

Elder McConkie ended his look at the anti-Christ by referencing 1 John 4:3 and then stating this (page 40): “This great antichrist which is to stand as the antagonist of Christ in the last days, and which is to be overthrown when he comes to cleanse the earth and usher in millennial righteousness, is the church of the devil.”

Thus, the Author of this blog suspects it is not necessarily a certain person that is the Anti-Christ – it can be – but usually it is any movement or group that goes against Christ’s teachings and the true church. The so-called “woke” movement often fits at least some of the parameters of an antiChrist movement; and surely liberals or groups who protect criminals, organize riots, work against Christianity and espouse hate may fit the bill too.

So, it be less a matter of "who" and more a matter of "what"...

Even Latter-day Saints who succumb to hate could also be in antiChrist territory.

 NOTE: This article and all of the NighUntoKolob blog are NOT an official website of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. They are the author's conclusions and opinions only.




 

 


 

 

 

Saturday, August 23, 2025

The Salt Lake Temple's Miraculous Inverted Granite Arches

 

This is an 1854 drawing of the Salt Lake Temple’s east side, by Truman O. Angell. Besides the temple, Angell also designed the Endowment House, a school building, homes, stores and other structures in early Utah territory. He also spent time in Britain and France studying those country’s architectural features. (Courtesy of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.)

IT is one of the myths in the Church that empty shafts were inspired to be placed during the construction of the Salt Lake Temple … and that in the future the technology of motorized elevators came along and thus they were easily installed into the Temple.

 The truth is Truman O. Angell, Sr., temple architect visited Europe in 1856, just when elevators were coming into use there. So, he knew about them. But it just turns out that the west center tower in the Salt Lake Temple was a convenient place for two elevators.


(Source: The Design, Construction, and Role of the Salt Lake Temple, by Richard O. Cowan, Brigham Young University’s Religious Studies Center.)

On the Web at:

https://rsc.byu.edu/salt-lake-city-place-which-god-prepared/design-construction-role-salt-lake-temple

However, one miraculous design element of the Salt Lake Temple is NOT a myth – and only in the early 21st Century -- more than 128 years since the Temple originally opened – has the reality of this amazing architectural feature been utilized.

Here are extracts from a certainly prophetic, April 3, 1993, Saturday morning session of General Conference, by President Body K. Packer, titled “The Temple, The Priesthood”:

“When the Saints trickled into the Salt Lake Valley, all they owned, or could hope to get, was carried in a wagon, or they must make it themselves.

They marked off the temple site before even the rudest log home was built. …”

“In 1853 the cornerstone was set, and ox teams began dragging granite stones from the mountains twenty miles away ....”

“President Young had said when they entered the Valley, “If they let us alone ten years we would ask no odds of them.” Ten years to the day a messenger arrived with word that Johnston’s army was marching west with orders to “settle the Mormon question.”

President Young told the Saints: “[We] have been driven from place to place; … we have been scattered and peeled. …

“… We have transgressed no law, … neither do we intend to; but as for any nation’s coming to destroy this people, God Almighty being my helper, they cannot come here.”

The settlements were evacuated, and the Saints moved south. Every stone was cleared away from Temple Square. The foundation, which after seven years’ work was nearing ground level, was covered over and the block was plowed.

Later, when the foundation was uncovered, they found a few cracks. It was torn out and replaced.

Sixteen large, inverted granite arches were built into the new foundation. There is no record as to why they did that. That manner of construction was unknown in this country then. If someday perchance there be a massive force wanting to lift the temple from beneath, then we shall know why they are there.”

There you go! An actual prophetic design feature in the Salt Lake Temple (and only visible when the entire foundation of the holy Temple was exposed in about 2020).

That’s because all estimated 187 million pounds of the Salt Lake Temple -- the weight of a modern aircraft carrier -- had to be lifted up significantly to install the seismic stabilizers beneath it, to make the sacred Temple earthquake resistant.

President Packer was inspired to mention this fact and sadly didn’t live long enough to see it come to pass, about 27 years AFTER he said it.

How did President Packer even know about the arches (hidden back in 1993)? Let alone mention the temple possibly being lifted one day, which it was...

  (Here's a link to President Packer's talk, if you want to read it in its entirety:

https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/general-conference/1993/04/the-temple-the-priesthood?lang=eng

Copy of a March 30,1963 photograph in the Deseret News of the east side of the Salt Lake Temple, during renovations, that clearly showed sandstone blocks still present in a sub-foundation.

 --Now what President Packer didn't mention was that when cracks in the Temple's foundation were discovered after the Johnston's Army Event, President Young realized that the red sandstone rock from Red Butte Canyon was not strong enough for a durable temple. That's when granite was used from then on, from Little Cottonwood Canyon. Some of that red sandstone sub-foundation were left in place and a granite foundation was place atop it.

(The sandstone sub-foundation was clearly visible when the church had excavations made along the temple's east side during a 1960s renovation.)

This January of 2023 photograph illustrates how far underground the crews revamping the Salt Lake Temple have gone. The Salt Lake Temple is estimated to weigh 187 million pounds or some 100,000 tons. That’s as much as an aircraft carrier and hence the difficulty in shoring up such a heavy structure, that is also more than a century old. (Author photo.)


 NOTE: This article and all of the NighUntoKolob blog are NOT an official website of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. They are the author's conclusions and opinions only.




 

 

Thursday, August 14, 2025

The Three Dimensions on Earth

 

                    NASA image from Wikipedia Commons, in public domain.


THERE appear to be three dimensions on our Earth.

  1.We live in the mortal, tangible dimension, separated from the other two.

  2.The Spirit World, where ALL persons instantly go when they die, is also located on Earth, but is in a separate pocket, a dimension, where spirits can reside and await the resurrection. Occasionally and not often, some righteous spirit world residents may be permitted by God to briefly visit, or interact with mortals on Earth.

  3.The “prison” dimension is where the one-third of the host of Heaven who rebelled against God are kept. They can apparently see what happens on Earth, with mortals. However, they can whisper in the minds of mortals on Earth, tempting them, as demons of Satan. And, if a person sins and allows a demonic spirit to take over their body (“possession”), they can do so at least temporarily, until cast out by the priesthood, or that person dies. It may also be possible that these demons can partially possess an evil person, adding a second voice to their mind, to prompt/instruct such persons to do even more evil.

Also, according to Alma 34:34:

"Ye cannot say, when ye are brought to that awful crisis, that I will repent, that I will return to my God. Nay, ye cannot say this; for that same spirit which doth possess your bodies at the time that ye go out of this life, that same spirit will have power to possess your body in that eternal world."

 Thus, evil spirits, as in the One-Third cast out, may still have some power over unrepentant spirits in the Spirit World too.

 NOTE: This article and all of the NighUntoKolob blog are NOT an official website of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. They are the author's conclusions and opinions only.