PRIOR to
April 1, 2018, mention anything about a temple in Layton, Utah and you were
talking about the Layton Buddhist Temple, 644 East 1000 North in Layton – as
that was the lone “temple” inside the City’s boundaries.
This temple
opened way back in 1979.
Announced on
Sunday, April 1, 2018 in General Conference, this temple will be the 19th
in Utah.
The artist's rendering of the Layton Temple, before construction. Courtesy of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
“We are now pleased to announce plans to construct seven more
temples,” said Church of Jesus Christ President Russell M. Nelson during the Sunday, April
1, 2018 afternoon session of General Conference. “Layton, Utah,” President
Nelson both smiled and laughed when he announced the name Layton, which was met
with awes and cheers.
(In one Layton household, a woman listening to General
Conference yelled, “What? What?” after the announcement was made.)
It was announced on July 15, 2019, that the temple site is indeed where this blog stated it would be 15 months earlier -- the corner of Oaks Hills Drive and Rosewood Lane. It will sit on an-11.8 acre site and be 3 stories tall and 87,000-square feet (or 75 percent as large as the Ogden Temple is).
The Layton Temple as viewed from the east.
It was announced on July 15, 2019, that the temple site is indeed where this blog stated it would be 15 months earlier -- the corner of Oaks Hills Drive and Rosewood Lane. It will sit on an-11.8 acre site and be 3 stories tall and 87,000-square feet (or 75 percent as large as the Ogden Temple is).
The Layton Temple as viewed from the east.
Mark and Elaine Morgan sold their home and surrounding land to the Church in April of 2018. They have lived there since 1952 and their family homesteaded the property back in the 1850s.
They didn't feel comfortable selling the land to developers, despite many offers over the years.
-Layton is a relatively “new” city in Utah, based on pioneer
settlements, being an outgrowth of Kaysville, Utah.
Layton community
residents de-annexed from Kaysville City, from 1902-1907, to become their own,
separate unincorporated area. Layton finally incorporated as a town in 1920.
However, the move for Layton
to become its own community had actually started a decade earlier in 1892.
According to the Davis
County Clipper newspaper of May 6, 1892, members of the Kaysville Second Ward
of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints really resided in what most
recognized as Layton territory and not Kaysville. Hence, some Church members
circulated a petition in 1892, asking Church leaders to rename the ward to what
it really is -- the Layton Ward.
"We do not live in
Kaysville City, nor Kaysville precinct, and why it is called the 2nd Ward of
Kaysville we cannot understand," the newspaper report stated.
Just less than 4 months
later, the Ward name change did take place.
“The members of second ward of Kaysville
last Sunday decided to change the name to Layton Ward
to so as to conform with the precinct and post office And
hereafter it will be known by that name.” (-Davis County Clipper, Aug. 31,
1892.)
When Layton
became its own official town in 1920, Kaysville’s population was 809, while
Layton had less than 400 residents.
Even
by 1940, Layton only had half the population of Kaysville, with 646 residents.
It
was World War II and rise of area military installations, like Hill Air
Force Base, that produced a surge in Layton’s population.
It
was probably around 1943 when Layton surpassed Kaysville in total population.
By 1950, Layton’s population was 3,456, as compared to 1,898 for Kaysville.
Layton
City reached another milestone in 1985, when it surpassed Bountiful as the
largest city in Davis County, with an estimated 36,000 residents.
In
2018, Layton has more than 76.000 residents, as compared to Bountiful’s 45,000
and Kaysville’s 32,000 populations.
Another view of the temple site in Layton, BEFORE construction.
Street sign view, with temple site to the right.
Horses graze on sacred ground, just south of Gentile and Oak Hills streets, before the Temple.
NOTE: This article and all of the NighUntoKolob blog are NOT an official website of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. They are the author's conclusions and opinions only.